Scientific Diaspora as a Driving Force for Development in Serbia

  • Srećko R. Stopić RWTH Aachen Univeristy
  • Robert Đ. Kozma Group 484, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Tanja J. Pavlov Group 484, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: scientific potential, brain drain, Metallurgy, diaspora,

Abstract


In the light of contemporary forms of migration and in the context of globalisation and rapid development of technology and transportation, diaspora is increasingly viewed through the transnational prism. Instead of forcedly scattered countrymen, who dream of returning to their homeland and have difficulties with the integration in the reception country, diaspora is seen as a link that connects worlds, the country of origin and the receiving country, thus enabling migration to be used for development of the community and society on the whole. Instead of return, the emphasis is on the circular exchange and transnational mobility. In this way countries of Southeast Europe are trying to transform the “brain drain”, which was particularly prominent in the 1990s, into “brain circulation” and “brain gain”. In Serbia, 1990s migration was triggered by saving lives, primarily from the painful and bloody civil wars waged in the former Yugoslavia, international isolation and NATO bombing, as well as the difficult economic situation. In that period, the particularly massive departure was that of young and educated people with the generally accepted slogan “to graduate, and then to emigrate”. However, migration of educated people and professionals, often motivated by career development and professional advancement abroad, has continued after 2000. Many young people are enabled to go abroad with the help of foreign scholarship foundations aiming at assisting development in Serbia, such as the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation AvH, German Academic Research Service DAAD, Mummert Foundation, etc. Therefore, the main objective of this paper is to determine the possibility for connection between professionals from diaspora and young students and engineers in Serbia, in order to facilitate the transfer of knowledge and their mobility and thus prevent the irreversible loss for the country. In addition to theoretical considerations of the possibility to improve cooperation with the diaspora, the paper analyses an example of successful cooperation between professionals in the metallurgical industry from Germany and professionals from Serbia, initiated by a representative of the professional diaspora. Finally, recommendations are made as to how to apply the lessons learned from the literature and practice for the development of sustainable cooperation among the professional diaspora and youth and professionals in Serbia.

 

Author Biography

Srećko R. Stopić, RWTH Aachen Univeristy

2001 Docent na Katedri za metalurgiju obojenih metala

2002-2013 Naucni Saradnik na Tehnickom Univerzitetu u Ahenu

References

Basch, L.G., Schiller, G.N., & Blanc-Szanton, C. 1994. Nations unbound: Transnational projects, post-colonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation states..Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach.

Beogradski centar za ljudska prava. 2001. Ljudska prava u Jugoslaviji 2000, Pravo i praksa u Saveznoj Republici Jugoslaviji i međunarodni standardi ljudskih prava.Beograd.

Božić, S. 2004. ‘Nacionalizam - nacija, ‘transnacionalizam' - ‘transnacija': mogućnosti terminološkog usklađivanja'.Revija za sociologiju, 35(3-4), pp. 187-203.

Bolčić, S. 2002. Iseljavanje radne snage i "odliv mozgova" iz Srbije tokom 90-tih. In S. Bolčić& A. Milić Eds., Srbija krajem milenijuma: Razaranje društva, promene i svakodnevni život.Beograd: Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta., pp. 159-168.

Cao, X. 1996. Debating ‘Brain Drain’ in the Context of Globalisation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 26(3), pp. 269-285. doi:10.1080/0305792960260303

de Haas, H. 2008. Migration and Development, A Theoretical Perspective. In Working paper.Oxford: International Migration Institute.

Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. 2011. Globalization, Brain Drain and Development. In Discussion Paper. nBonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.

Filipovic, J. 2012. Diaspora Virtual University as a Complex Organization- Serbian Diaspora Virtual University, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Glick-Schiller, N., Basch, L., & Blanc-Szanton, C. 1992. Towards a Transnationalization of Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Nationalism Reconsidered. The Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 645, p. 24.

Grečić, V., & Lopušina, M. 1994. Svi Srbi sveta.Beograd: Princip.

Horvat, V. 2004. Brain Drain. Threat to Successful Transition in South East Europe. Southeast European Politics, 5(1), pp. 76-93.

Kuti, S., & Božić, S. 2011. Analitičke dimenzije za istraživanje transnacionalnih aktivnosti: primjer kineskih migranata u Hrvatskoj. Revija za sociologiju, 41(3), pp. 315-340.

Kuznetsov, Y. 2006. Diaspora Networks and the International Migration of Skills: How Countries Can Draw on Their Talent Abroad. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank.

Matula, G., Bogovic, J., Stopic, S., & Friedrich, B. 2013. Scale up of ultrasonic spray pyrolysis process for nanopowder production- Part one. In Heat treatment, pp. 46-50.

Morawska, E. 2003. Disciplinary Agendas and Analytic Strategies of Research on Immigrant Transnationalism: Challenges of Interdisciplinary Knowledge. International Migration Review, 37(3), pp. 611-640. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00152.x

Morokvašić, M. 2011. Transnational Mobility of the Highly Skilled: Challenges for Serbia and the Western Balkans. In N. Polovina& T. Pavlov Eds., Mobility and Emigration of Professionals: Personal and Social Gains and Losses. Belgrade: Group 484., pp. 164-181.

OECD. 2008. A Profile of Immigrant Populations in the 21st Century.

Pavlov, T. 2011. The motivation for migration of highly qualified people in Serbia. In N. Polovina& T. Pavlov Eds. Mobility and Emigration of Professionals: Personal and Social Gains and Losses. Belgrade: Group 484., pp. 149-163.

Pavlov, T., & Rakić, D. 2011. Developing Brain Gain Policies in Serbia. Belgrade: Group 484. Policy Paper.

Portes, A. 2003. Conclusion: Theoretical Convergencies and Empirical Evidence in the Study of Immigrant Transnationalism. International Migration Review, 37(3), pp. 874-892. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00161.x

Portes, A. 2001. Introduction: the debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 1(3), pp. 181-194. doi:10.1111/1471-0374.00012

Portes, A. 1997. Immigration theory for a new century: some problems and opportunities. International migration review, 31(4), pp. 799-825. pmid:12293206. doi:10.2307/2547415

Saxenian, A.L. 2005. From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), pp. 35-61. doi:10.1007/BF02686293

Stopic, S. 2008. Ugledajte se na njih- Neobicne price o uspesnim ljudima, o kojima se malo zna i retko pise., p. 123.

Stopic, S. 2009. Prodavci znanja- Neobicne price o uspesnim ljudima dijaspore, o kojima se malo zna i retko pise., p. 123.

Trgovčević, Lj. 2003. The Planned Elite, Students from Serbia in European Universities in the 19th Century. Belgrade: The Institute of History.

Vertovec, S. 2009. Transnationalism. London and New York: Routledge.

Waldinger, R., & Fitzgerald, D. 2004. Transnationalism in Question. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), pp. 1177-1195. doi:10.1086/381916

Published
2013/12/06
Section
Review Papers