Application of new robust design by means of probability-based multi-objective optimization to machining process parameters

Keywords: preferable probability, probability-based method, multi-objective optimization, robust design, simultaneous optimization

Abstract


Introduction/purpose: New robust design by means of probability-based multi-objective optimization takes the arithmetic mean value of the performance indicator and its deviation as twin independent responses of the performance indicator. The aim of this article is to check the applicability of new robust design in optimizing machining process parameters. To conduct the examination in detail, the robust design for optimal cutting parameters to minimize energy consumption during the turning of AISI 1018 steel at a constant material removal rate is applied as well as the concurrent optimization of the machining process parameters and the tolerance allocation of a spheroidal graphite cast iron piston. 

Methods: In the spirit of the probability-based method for multi-objective optimization, the arithmetic mean value of the performance indicator and its deviation are taken as two independent responses of the performance indicator to implement robust design. Each of the above twin responses contributes one part of the partial preferable probabilities to the performance indicator of the alternatives in the treatment. The arithmetic mean value of the performance indicator should be assessed as a representative of the performance indicator according to the function or the preference of the performance indicator, and the deviation is the other index of the performance indicator, which has the characteristic of the smaller-the-better in general. Furthermore, the square root of the product of the above two parts of the partial preferable probability forms the actual preferable probability of the performance indicator. Moreover, the product of partial preferable probabilities gives the total preferable probability of each alternative, which is the overall and unique index of each alternative in the robust optimum.

Results: The paper gives the rational optimum cutting parameters for minimizing energy consumption during the turning of AISI 1018 steel at a constant material removal rate and the concurrent optimization of the machining process parameters and the tolerance allocation of a spheroidal graphite cast iron piston.

Conclusion: The application study indicates its rationality and convenience of new robust optimization in the optimization of machining process parameters.

 

References

Box, G. 1988. Signal-to-Noise Ratios, Performance Criteria, and Transformations. Technometrics, 30(1), pp.1-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1270311>

Box, G.E.P. & Meyer, R.D. 1986. Dispersion Effects from Fractional Designs. Technometrics, 28(1), pp.19-27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1986.10488094>

Camposeco-Negrete, C., de Dios Calderón Nájera, J. & Miranda-Valenzuela, J.C. 2016 Optimization of cutting parameters to minimize energy consumption during turning of AISI 1018 steel at constant material removal rate using robust design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83, pp.1341-1347. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7679-9>

Janakiraman, V. & Saravanan, R. 2010. Concurrent optimization of machining process parameters and tolerance allocation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51, pp.357-369. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2602-x>

Mori, T. & Tsai, S-C. 2011. Taguchi Methods: Benefits, Impacts, Mathematics, Statistics, and Applications. New York, NY, USA: ASME Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.859698>

Nair, V.N., Abraham, B., MacKay, J., Box, G., Kacker, R.N., Lorenzen, T.J., Lucas, J.M., Myers, R.H., Vining, G.G., Nelder, J.A., Phadke, M.S., Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Shoemaker, A.C., Tsui, K.L., Taguchi, S. & Wu, C.F.J. 1992. Taguchi's Parameter Design: A Panel Discussion. Technometrics, 34(2), pp.127-161. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1269231>

Roy, R.K. 2010. A Primer on the Taguchi Method. 2nd Ed. Southfield, Michigan, USA: Society of Manufacturing Engineers. ISBN-13‏: ‎978-0872638648.

Welch, W.J., Buck, R.J., Sacks, J., Wynn, H.P., Mitchell, T.J. & Morris, M.D. 1992. Screening, Predicting, and Computer Experiments. Technometrics, 34(1), pp.15-25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1269548>

Welch, W.J., Yu, T-K., Kang, S.M. & Sacks, J. 1990. Computer experiments for quality control by parameter design. Journal of Quality Technology, 22(1), pp.15-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1990.11979201>

Zheng, M., Teng, H., Yu, J., Cui ,Y. & Wang Y. 2023. Probability-Based Multi-objective Optimization for Material Selection. Singapore: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3351-6>

Zheng, M., Wang, Y. & Teng, H. 2022a. An novel method based on probability theory for simultaneous optimization of multi – object orthogonal test design in material engineering. Kovove Materialy, 60(1), pp.45-53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31577/km.2022.1.45>

Zheng, M., Wang, Y. & Teng, H. 2022b. A novel approach based on probability theory for material selection. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, 53(6), pp.666-674. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.202100226>

Published
2023/01/30
Section
Original Scientific Papers