Strategic framework for selecting advanced air defence systems: insights from a developing country
A Hybrid MCDM Framework for Missile Systems Selection
Abstract
Introduction/Purpose: In this modern world, every country is trying to improve its defense system by acquiring new technologies. One of the main components of a defense system is the Air Defense System (ADS), which further includes fighter aircraft, drones, 3D radar, fighter command vehicles, and missile systems. The missile system has become the most important component of air defense systems around the globe. Due to the limited resources and weak economy, it is a challenge for a developing country to acquire an ADS that suits its resources and economic capabilities. This research paper aims to study the needs and goals of the defense system of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) and to select the best missile system to improve its existing air defense system. Methods: A hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodology, Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) are used to evaluate the factors affecting the missile system as well as to select the best missile system for Pakistan. Results: The results depict that the S-400 missile system is the most feasible for Pakistan's air defense, followed by THAAD and S-300, which can meet the country's current security needs.Conclusion: The research concludes that precision target capability, range, and maneuverability are the prominent factors that play a greater role in the ADS sector of Pakistan. This research is the first of its kind to use the DEMATEL-AHP approach for the evaluation of air defense systems in the case of a developing country such as Pakistan.
References
Anwar, U. and Atif, M. (2025) ‘“CPEC & BRI regional game changers: security and geopolitical implications in Pakistan”’, Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, pp. 1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2025.2480945.
Appasamy, S. (2026) ‘A Study on DEMATEL Approach Under Uncertainty Environments’, Spectrum of Operational Research, 3(1), pp. 29–39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31181/sor31202628.
Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S. and Kılınç, N. (2009) ‘Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment’, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), pp. 8143–8151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016.
Dagistanli, H. A., 2023. An integrated fuzzy MCDM and trend analysis approach for financial performance evaluation of energy companies in Borsa Istanbul sustainability index. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 1(1), pp.39-49., 1(1), pp. 39-49.
Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y. & Sankaram, M., 2014. Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D-number. Expert System with Applications, Volume 41, pp. 156-167.
Dincer, H., Yuksel, S. & Eti, S., 2023. Identifying the right policies for increasing the efficiency of the renewable energy transition with a novel fuzzy decision-making model. ournal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics,, 1(1), pp. 50-62.
Felice, F.D. and Petrillo, A. (eds) (29) The art of decision making: applying AHP in practice. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen (Business, management and economics). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003360.
Gandhi, S., Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P. & Kumar, D., 2015. Evaluating factors in implementation of successful green supply chain management using DEMATEL: A case study. International Strategic Management Review, 3(2), pp. 96-109.
Hanif, R. and Sultan, I. (2024) ‘The Economic Dependency of Pakistan: Reasons, Challenges and Prospects’, Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11471595.
Ivan, P., Milan, K. & Krum, C., 2015. Significance and prospects of the development of air defence system. SCINDEKS, 67(6), pp. 86-98.
Jones, S.G. (2024) Rebuilding the Arsenal of Democracy: the U. S. and Chinese Defense Industrial Bases in an Era of Great Power Competition. 1st ed. Blue Ridge Summit: Center for Strategic & International Studies.
Khan, A. U. & Ali, Y., 2020. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process methods and their applications: a twenty year review from 2000-2019: AHP & ANP techniques and their applications: Twenty years review from 2000 to 2019. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(3).
Khan, A.U. and Ali, Y. (2021) ‘Sustainable supplier selection for the cold supply chain (CSC) in the context of a developing country’, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(9), pp. 13135–13164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01203-0.
Khan, A.U. and Ali, Y. (2023) ‘Enhancement of resilience and quality of cold supply chain under the disruptions caused by COVID-19: A case of a developing country’, Australian Journal of Management, 48(2), pp. 341–365. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962221095596.
Khan, A.U. et al. (2022) ‘Risk Management for Cold Supply Chain: Case of a Developing Country’, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 19(8), pp. 161–185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.19.8.2022.8.10.
Khurshid, T. and Zaman, H. (2024) ‘AI INTEGRATION IN INDIAN MILITARY: APPRAISAL OF SECURITY APPREHENSIONS FOR SOUTH ASIA’, NDU Journal, pp. 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54690/ndujournal.38.179.
Kizielewicz, B. and Salabun, W. (2024) ‘A Robust Framework for Renewable Energy Policy Evaluation Using MCDA and Compromise Ranking with Stochastic Weight Identification’, Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, 3(4), pp. 213–223. Available at: https://doi.org/10.56578/jimd030402.
Kolour, H. R., Momayezi, V. & Momayezi, F., 2026. Enhancing Supplier Selection in Public Manufacturing: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 3(1), pp. 1-20.
Kumar, R. (2025) ‘A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Methods, Applications, and Emerging Trends’, Decision Making Advances, 3(1), pp. 185–199. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31181/dma31202569.
Lin, L.-H. and Wang, K.-J. (2024) ‘Enhancing Talent Retention in Work 4.0 Era: An Improved Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Methodology’, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-024-01844-7.
Malmir, A. (2026) ‘Ranking of Factors Affecting Transformational Leadership in Organizations: Application of AHP Method in Optimizing Leadership Strategies’, Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 3(1), pp. 62–69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap31202627.
Matthews, R. and Anicetti, J. (2024) ‘The role of defence countertrade in Chinese geoeconomic diplomacy’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(5), pp. 612–642. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2024.2327842.
Moric, I. and Kadyshev, T. (2025) ‘Forecasting Costs of U.S. Ballistic Missile Defense Against a Major Nuclear Strike’, Defence and Peace Economics, 36(2), pp. 141–166. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2024.2396415.
Muhammad Usman, Dr.S. (2024) ‘Pakistan in the Crosshairs and the Rising Stakes of Strategic Information Warfare’, Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 12(1), pp. 25–47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.52015/jrss.12i1.235.
Mynuddin, M. et al. (2024) ‘Trojan Attack and Defense for Deep Learning-Based Navigation Systems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’, IEEE Access, 12, pp. 89887–89907. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3419800.
Park, H.-R. (2024) ‘A non-nuclear US ally’s nuclear preparedness dilemma: South Korea’s “Three-Axis System”’, Defence Studies, 24(2), pp. 257–276. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2024.2303412.
Passbach, D. (2024) ‘National and International Perspectives of the Hungarian Ground-Based Air Defence Forces (1): Strategic Environment and First Glimpse of Multinational Capability Development Options’, Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science, 23(2), pp. 39–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32565/aarms.2024.2.3.
Pham, T.Y. et al. (2024) ‘The fuzzy MCDM for container terminal choice in Vietnam from shipping lines’ perspective based on cumulative prospect theory’, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 40(3), pp. 147–156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2024.06.003.
Rehman, S. (2024) ‘Indian Counterforce Capabilities and the New Era of Preemption in South Asia’, Journal of Security & Strategic Analyses, 10(1), pp. 05–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.57169/jssa.0010.01.0291.
Saaty, T.L. (1994) ‘Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process’, European Journal of Operational Research, 74(3), pp. 426–447. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4.
Sagild, R.Å. and Hsiung, C.W. (2024) ‘Chinese Re-Examinations of Russia? The Strategic Partnership in the Wake of Russia’s War Against Ukraine’, Journal of Contemporary China, pp. 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2024.2358876.
Sari, R. E., Melamedika, C., Hartati, T. & Iljannah, C., 2024. Active Sensor Working system on anti-aircraft missiles. Journal of Frontier Research in Science and Engineering, 2(3), pp. 20-25.
Siddiqui, S., 2017. Pakistan Observer. [Online] Available at: https://pakobserver.net/pak-inducts-advanced-air-defence-system/[Accessed 07 February 2019].
Singh, V. and Sharma, S.K. (2024) ‘Critical factors of multi-agent technology influencing manufacturing organizations: an AHP and DEMATEL-oriented analysis’, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 37(3), pp. 243–265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2023.2209857.
Sinha, A., 2018. The Economic Times. [Online] Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/pakistan-deploys-chinese-air-defence-system-where-does-india-stand/articleshow/57630076.cms [Accessed 8 February 2019].
Streeck, W. (2025) ‘Notes on the political economy of war’, in R. Giammetti and T. Palley (eds) The Political Economy of War, Peace, and the Military–Industrial Complex. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 19–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035357178.00007.
Vatan, E., Raissi Ardali, G.A. and Shahin, A. (2024) ‘Selecting information systems development models based on organizational culture: an integrated approach of DEMATEL and ANP’, VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(3), pp. 531–560. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2021-0164.
Zhang, W. and Gao, H. (2026) ‘Interpretable Robust Multicriteria Ranking with TODIM in Generalized Orthopair Fuzzy Settings’, Spectrum of Operational Research, 3(1), pp. 14–28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31181/sor31202632.
Copyright (c) 2025 Yousaf Ali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Proposed Creative Commons Copyright Notices
Proposed Policy for Military Technical Courier (Journals That Offer Open Access)
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).