Barriers and opportunities to innovation in the Malaysian Army: a multilevel approach

A MULTILEVEL APPROACH

Keywords: innovation, barriers to innovation, ecosystem, armed forces, military, malaysian Army

Abstract


The objective of the present study is to examine the barriers and opportunities to innovation at the individual, team, and organisational levels in the Malaysian Army. This exploratory study uses an interpretative phenomenology approach to analyse qualitative data from 15 interviews conducted with military officers and other ranks who contributed consistently to the Malaysian Armed Forces’ innovations. Findings highlighted that individual-level barriers were subdivided into seven themes, while team-level barriers consist of six and organisational-level barriers are four themes. This study recommends the roles of various actors and teams within the innovation ecosystem in removing barriers to innovation. The present study's findings contribute to a more holistic understanding of barriers to innovation, which is an under-researched topic in the Malaysian Army. This study offers a multilevel framework of barriers and potential interventions for the Malaysian Army to support innovation by addressing unique challenges and suggesting avenues for further research

References

Bidwell, C.A. and Macdonald, B.W. (2018) Emerging Disruptive Technologies and Their Potential Threat to Strategic Stability and National Security [online]. https://fas.org/wp-content/uploads/media/FAS-Emerging-Technologies-Report.pdf [Accessed on: 14 January 2025].

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brooks, J. et al. (2015) ‘The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), pp. 202–222. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224

Cinar, E., Trott, P. and Simms, C. (2019) ‘A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process’, Public Management Review, 21(2), pp. 264–290. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477

Creswell, J.W. (2024) Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, Educational Principles and Practice in Veterinary Medicine. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119852865.ch17

Dale F. Reding Álvaro Martín Blanco Angelo De Lucia Col Laura A. Regan, USAF, P.D.B. (2023) Science & Technology Trends 2023-2043 Across the Physical, Biological, and Information Domains NATO Science & Technology Organization : Part 2, NATO Science & Technology Organization.

Hartono, A., & Kusumawardhani, R. (2019). Innovation Barriers and Their Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Firms. Global Business Review, 20(5), 1196–1213. https: doi.org/10.1177/0972150918801647

Hashim, K.L. (2021) ‘Enhancing Innovative Work Behaviour of Malaysian Public Sector Employees’, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(2), pp. 253–265. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i2.665

Ijebor, C. (2019) ‘The Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Facilitating Military Innovation.’, Journal of Military & Strategic Studies, 20(1), pp. 234–261 [online]. Available at: https://jmss.org/article/view/69495/53641%0Ahttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tsh&AN=140914996&lang=pl&site=ehost-live [Accessed: 14 February 2025].

Ismail & Johnson (2021) ‘Operating as a Social Enterprise within Resource and Institutional Constraints’, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 11(1), pp. 1–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0120

Johnny Saldana (2013) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd edition), Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/qrom-08-2016-1408

Khaled Osmani and Detlef Schulz (2024) ‘Comprehensive Investigation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’, MDPI [Preprint].

King, N. (2012) ‘Doing Template Analysis’, in, pp. 426–450. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435620.n24

Langdridge, D. (2007) ‘Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method’.

Morse, J.M. et al. (2002) ‘Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), pp. 13–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202

Nikander, P. (2008) ‘Working with transcripts and translated data’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(3), pp. 225–231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802314346

Patton, M.Q. (2002) ‘Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiential Perspective’, Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), pp. 261–283. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636

Retkoceri, B. and Kurteshi, R. (2018) ‘Barriers to innovation in services and manufacturing firms: The case of Kosovo’, HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, 9(2), pp. 73–94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2018-0013

Rosen, S.P. (1991) Winning the Next War: Innovation and the Modern Military. Cornell University Press (Cornell studies in security affairs) [online]. Available at: https://books.google.com.my/books?id=ncLRUf-q-XYC [Accessed: 21 January 2019]

Rusu, M.-L. (2023) ‘The Military Organization – A Culture of Innovation’, Land Forces Academy Review, 28(2), pp. 126–135. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2023-0016

Scaliza, J.A.A. et al. (2022) ‘Relationships among organizational culture, open innovation, innovative ecosystems, and performance of firms: Evidence from an emerging economy context’, Journal of Business Research, 140, pp. 264–279. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.065

Smith, J.A., Flowers, P. and Larkin, M. (2009) ‘Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research’, QMiP Bulletin, 1(10), pp. 44–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2010.1.10.44

Smith, J.A. and Osborn, M. (2008) ‘Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis’, in Doing Social Psychology Research, pp. 229–254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776278.ch10

Srirahayu, D.P., Ekowati, D. and Sridadi, A.R. (2023) ‘Innovative work behavior in public organizations: A systematic literature review’, Heliyon, 9(2), p. e13557. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13557

The Government of Malaysia (2021) Twelfth Malaysia Plan 2021-2025: A Prosperous, Inclusive, Sustainable Malaysia, Directorate General Economic Planning Unit [online]. Available at: https://rmke12.epu.gov.my/bm [Accessed: 24 February 2025].

Weiss, M. (2018) ‘How to become a first mover? Mechanisms of military innovation and the development of drones’, European Journal of International Security, 3, pp. 1–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.15

Yusof, N.A.M. et al. (2022) ‘Challenges and Barriers in Public Services Innovations in Malaysia’, STI Policy and Management Journal, 7(1), pp. 47–61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14203/stipm.2022.326

Published
2025/12/17
Section
Review Papers