Model planiranja logističke podrške u uslovima ograničenih resursa
Sažetak
Uvod: U radu je predstavljen model planiranja logističke podrške u uslovima ograničenih logističkih resursa na osnovu prioritizacije zahteva kupaca i alokacije resursa. Donosioci odluka imaju ključnu ulogu u efikasnoj i pravičnoj alokaciji resursa jer daju prioritet različitim zahtevima korisnika.
Metode: Tehnike prioritizacije zahteva koje koriste nominalnu skalu, ordinalnu skalu i skalu odnosa, kao i pet metoda za pretvaranje ranga u težinske koeficijente, primenjene su kako bi se odredio stepen značaja zahteva korisnika. Za utvrđivanje relativnih prioriteta korišćen je metod trijaže zahteva, dok je heuristički algoritam za određivanje medijane Kemenija korišćen za konsolidaciju individualno rangiranih zahteva u grupni rang. Radi balansiranja suprotstavljenih zahteva korisnika, korišćene su mere konsenzusa grupnog odlučivanja. Za dobijanje optimalnog planskog rešenja logističke podrške primenjene su metode i tehnike raspodele resursa.
Rezultati: Razvijen je model za adaptivno planiranje logističke podrške u uslovima ograničenih resursnih kapaciteta logističkog sistema.
Zaključak: Predloženi model može se efikasno primeniti i u drugim oblastima alokacije resursa.
Reference
Achimugu, P., Selamat, A., Ibrahim, R. & Mahrin, M.N. 2014. A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research. Information and Software Technology, 56(6), pp.568-585. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.02.001
Alfares, H.K. & Duffuaa, S.O. 2016. Simulation-based evaluation of criteria rank-weighting methods in multi-criteria decision-making. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(01), pp.43-61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622015500315
Andrejić, M. 2001. Methods and software for the support of planning in logistic organizational systems. Vojnotehnički glasnik /Military Technical Courier, 49(1), pp.36-52 (in Serbian). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg0101036A
Andrejić, M., Nikolić, N. & Stojković, D. 2004. Logistička podrška logističkim operacijama. Vojnotehnički glasnik /Military Technical Courier, 52(3-4), pp.275-285 (in Serbian). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg0404275A
Chevaleyre, Y., Dunne, P., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Lemaıtre, M., Maudet, N., Padget, J., Phelps, S., Rodrıguez-Aguilar, J. & Sousa, P. 2006. Issues in multiagent resource allocation. Informatica, 30(1), pp.3-31 [online]. Available at: https://www.informatica.si/index.php/informatica/article/view/70 [Accessed: 5 July 2021].
Daoud, A., Balbo, F., Gianessi, P. & Picard, G. 2021. A Generic Multi-Agent Model for Resource Allocation Strategies in Online On-Demand Transport with Autonomous Vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference AAMAS 2021, London, UK, p.3, May, hal-03093017 [online]. Available at: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/DEMO-ENSMSE/hal-03093017v1 [Accessed: 5 July 2021].
Dong, Y. & Zhang, H. 2014. Multiperson decision making with different preference representation structures: A direct consensus framework and its properties. Knowledge-Based Systems, 58, pp.45-57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.09.021
Hameed, A., Khoshkbarforoushha, A., Ranjan, R., Jayaraman, P.P., Kolodziej, J., Balaji, P., Zeadally, S, Malluhi, Q.M., Tziritas, N., Vishnu, A., Khan, S.U. & Zomaya, A. 2016. A survey and taxonomy on energy-efficient resource allocation techniques for cloud computing systems. Computing, 98(7), pp.751-774. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-014-0407-8
Hudaib, A., Masadeh, R., Qasem, M. & Alzaqebah, A. 2018. Requirements prioritization techniques comparison. Modern Applied Science, 12(2), pp.62-80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v12n2p62
Hurley, P.C.Jr & Coleman, H.H. 2018. What FM 3-0 means for expeditionary battlefield sustainment. Army Sustainment, May-June [online]. Available at: https://www.army.mil/article/203894 [Accessed: 5 July 2021].
Jia, Q., Wang, T-n & Zhang, Y-c. 2020. A New Mode of Army Equipment Support. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1649, pp.1-8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1649/1/012042
Khan, J.A., Rehman, I.U., Khan, Y.H., Khan, I.J. & Rashid, S. 2015. Comparison of Requirement Prioritization Techniques to Find Best Prioritization Technique. International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science, 7(11), pp.53-59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2015.11.06
Kostiuchenko, L. & Solomon, D. 2020. The basic terminology of the modern military logistics. Intellectualization of logistics and supply chain management, 1(1), pp.91-98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46783/smart-scm/2020-1-8
Lehtola, L., Kauppinen, M. & Kujala, S. 2004. Requirements Prioritization Challenges in Practice. In: Bomarius, F. & Iida, H. (Eds.) Product Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3009, pp.497-508. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24659-6_36. ISBN: 978-3-540-24659-6.
Li, X., Li, A. & Guo, X. 2020. The sustainable development-oriented development and utilization of renewable energy industry – A comprehensive analysis of MCDM methods. Energy, 212(art.number:118694). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118694
Luss, H. 1999. On Equitable Resource Allocation Problems: A Lexicographic Minimax Approach. Operations Research 47(3), pp.361-378, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.47.3.361
Luss, H. 2012. Equitable resource allocation: Models, Algorithms, and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-1-118-05468-0.
McConnell, B.M., Hodgson, T.J., Kay, M.G., King, R.E., Liu, Y., Parlier, G.H., Thoney-Barletta, K. & Wilson, J.R. 2021. Assessing uncertainty and risk in an expeditionary military logistics network. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 18(2), pp.135-156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512919860595
McConnell, B.M. & King, R. 2019. Expeditionary Logistics Analysis for Decision Support. Technical Report. North Carolina State University Raleigh United States [online]. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1092064 [Accessed: 5 July 2021].
Meran, G., Siehlow, M. & von Hirschhausen, C. 2021. Integrated Water Resource Management: Principles and Applications. In: The Economics of Water, pp.23-121. Springer, Cham. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48485-9_3. ISBN: 978-3-030-48485-9.
Milenkov, M.A., Sokolović, V.S., Milovanović, V.R. & Milić, M.D. 2020. Logistics: Its role, significance and approaches. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 68(1), pp.79-106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg68-24805
Milićević, M.R., & Milenkov, M.A. 2014. Determination of criteria weights using ranking. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 62(1), pp.141-166 (in Serbian). Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg62-3878
Moisiadis, F. 2002. The fundamentals of prioritizing requirements. In: Proceedings of the systems engineering, test and evaluation conference (SETE’2002), Sydney, Australia, October [online]. Available at: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.92.4036&rep=rep1&type=pdf [Accessed: 6 July 2021].
Ogryczak, W., Luss, H., Pióro, M., Nace, D. & Tomaszewski, A. 2014. Fair optimization and networks: A survey. Journal of Applied Mathematics, art.ID:612018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/612018
Olaronke, I., Rhoda, I. & Ishaya, G. 2018. An appraisal of software requirement prioritization techniques. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 1(1), pp.1-16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2018/v1i124717
Pamučar, D.S. & Savin, L.M. 2020. Multiple-criteria model for optimal off-road vehicle selection for passenger transportation: BWM-COPRAS model. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 68(1), pp.28-64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg68-22916
Pérez, I.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., Alonso, S., Dong, Y.C., Chiclana, F. & Herrera-Viedma, E. 2018. On dynamic consensus processes in group decision making problems. Information Sciences, 459, pp.20-35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.05.017
Qaddoura, R., Abu-Srhan, A., Qasem, M.H. & Hudaib, A. 2017. Requirements prioritization techniques review and analysis. In: 2017 International Conference on New Trends in Computing Sciences (ICTCS), Amman, Jordan, pp.258-263, October 11-13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTCS.2017.55
Rogers, M.B., McConnell, B.M., Hodgson, T.J., Kay, M.G., King, R.E., Parlier, G. & Thoney-Barletta, K. 2018. A Military Logistics Network Planning System. Military Operations Research, 23(4), pp.5-24 [online]. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26553094 [Accessed: 5 July 2021].
Sarma, D., Das, A., Dutta, P. & Bera, U.K. 2020. A Cost Minimization Resource Allocation Model for Disaster Relief Operations With an Information Crowdsourcing-Based MCDM Approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, pp.1-21., Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3015775
Schwartz, B., McConnell, B.M. & Parlier, G.H. 2019. How Data Analytics Will Improve Logistics Planning. Army Sustainment, 51(3), pp.54-57 [online]. Available at: https://alu.army.mil/alog/ARCHIVE/PB700201903FULL.pdf [Accessed: 5 July 2021].
Skobelev, P. 2011. Multi-agent systems for real-time resource allocation, scheduling, optimization and controlling: industrial applications. In: Mařík, V., Vrba, P., Leitão, P. (Eds.) Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems for Manufacturing. HoloMAS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6867, pp.1-14. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23181-0_1. ISBN: 978-3-642-23181-0.
Tang, H., Wan, S., Li, C-C., Liang, H. & Dong, Y. 2021. Consensus Reaching Process in the Two-Rank Group Decision-Making with Heterogeneous Preference Information. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 14(1), pp.758-768. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.210201.001
Tufail, H., Qasim, I., Masood, M.F., Tanvir, S. & Butt, W.H. 2019. Towards the selection of Optimum Requirements Prioritization Technique: A Comparative Analysis. In: The 5th International Conference on Information Management, Cambridge, UK, pp.227-231, March 24-27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOMAN.2019.8714709
Vestola, M. 2010. A comparison of nine basic techniques for requirements prioritization, pp.1-8. Helsinki University of Technology [online]. Available at: http://www.mvnet.fi/publications/software_development_seminar.pdf [Accessed: 5 July 2021].
Wei, X., Quan, S., , Shi zhuang, Y, Yan song, A. & Gang, Q. 2021. Research on Dynamic Resource Allocation and Decision-making Model of Equipment Independent Maintenance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1939, pp.1-9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1939/1/012014
Zeimpekis, V., Kaimakamis, G. & Daras, N.J. 2015. Military logistics: research advances and future trends. Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12075-1. ISBN: 978-3-319-12075-1.
Zlatnik, D. & Mares, J. 2020. Ammunition supplies, new proposal of ammunition sufficiency. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 68(2), pp.250-267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg68-25193
Zou, H., Liu, D., Guo, S., Xiong, L., Liu, P., Yin, J., Zeng, Y., Zhang, J. & Shen, Y. 2019. Quantitative assessment of adaptive measures on optimal water resources allocation by using reliability, resilience, vulnerability indicators. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 34, pp.103-199. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01753-4
Vojnotehnički glasnik omogućava otvoreni pristup i, u skladu sa preporukom CEON-a, primenjuje Creative Commons odredbe o autorskim pravima:
Autori koji objavljuju u Vojnotehničkom glasniku pristaju na sledeće uslove:
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga Creative Commons licencom koja omogućava drugima da dele rad uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju rada objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je rad izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno i podstiču se da postave objavljeni rad onlajn (npr. u institucionalnom repozitorijumu ili na svojim internet stranicama) pre i tokom postupka prijave priloga, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog rada (up. Efekat otvorenog pristupa).