FROM METAPHYSICAL TO POLITICAL: DOES POLITICAL CULTURE MAKE RAWLS’S PRINCIPLE OF TOLERANCE MORALLY RELATIVISTIC?
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze Rawls’s conception of political (public) culture, exploring whether his principle of tolerance (Political Liberalism) falls in the moral relativism. The analysis consists of three sections. Firstly, the author introduces different critical accounts on Rawls’s theory and identify where do they go wrong. Secondly, the author delineates the intellectual tradition of social liberalism from which sprang Rawls’s conception, showing that he significantly alters the key ideas of dominant liberal justice of the Western world. In the final section of the paper it is argued that Rawls’s idea of political culture is a cornerstone of just society and the spring of tolerance, providing arguments in favor of the idea that Rawls’s conception of political liberalism is not morally relativistic but it is in line with liberal pluralism.
References
Berlin, I. (2002). Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boucher, D. & Vincent, A. (2000). British Idealism and Political Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Brecht, A. (1947). Political Theory: Beyond Relativism in Political Theory. The American Political Science Review, 41(3): 470 – 488.
Green, T. H. (1999). Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Hampton, J. (1995). Hobbes and the Social Contract Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hampton, J. (1989). Should Political Philosophy be Done Without Metaphysics? Ethics, 99(4): 791 – 814.
Pavićević, Đ. (2011). Pravda i politika. Beograd: Fabrika knjiga.
Podunavac, M. (1998). Princip građanstva i poredak politike. Beograd: Čigoja.
Podunavac, M.(2008). Politička kultura i politički odnosi. Beograd: Čigoja.
Rawls, J. (1974). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press.
Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as Fairness: Political, not Metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14(3): 223 – 251.
Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Strauss, L. (1988). What is Political Philosophy? Chicago & London: Chicago University Press.
Strauss, L. (1961). Relativism. In: H. Schoeck and J.W. Wiggins (eds.), Relativism and the Study of Man (pp. 13 – 26). Princeton: Van Nostrand.
Verba, S. (1965). Conclusion: Comparative political culture. In: Pye, L. W., Verba, S., Political Culture and Political Development (pp. 512 – 560). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vranic, B. (2016). Democratic Values, Emotions and Emotivism. Philosophy and Society, 27(4): 723 – 738.
Wolin, S. S. (2002). Politics and Vision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dijele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno i podstiču se da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) prije ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmjeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka (Vidi Efekti otvorenog pristupa).