SOCIAL WORK IN COMON PRACTICE OF REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA SOCIAL PROTECTION

  • Mira Cuk Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci Fakultet političkih nauka
  • Irina Savović Centar za socijalni rad Trebinje
Keywords: Social work, social protection, changes, human rights,

Abstract


The review presents the results of a qualitative research conducted with the assistance of thirteen  social workers employed in social care institutions. The purpose of the research is to determine their attitudes on the issues of social work in social protection in present-day conditions.

The focus group method is used for data collection and the method of frame analysis is used in setting up research questions and analysing the findings.

The results of the research show that there is a routine present in the jobs of social workers in  social welfare institutions, with few changes introduced, with practices including individuals or families being dominant ones. In addition, in most cases changes refer to the establishment of new legal solutions that produce changes in the organisation of labour, whereas social work itself does not affect changes in legislation, with political factors strongly influencing overall social work activities.

Furthermore, the results of the research show that social work based on human rights is mostly realised in the domain of individual satisfaction of the needs of users, and that administrative and administrative-legal affairs dominate in practice, while the tasks of monitoring social needs, analysing the situation, starting initiatives, planning and development, and making reports and analyses are completely ignored. Modern challenges that social workers are faced with pose demands that they cannot fully respond to. The right and the obligation to continuous improvement is not a systemically regulated issue, and the lack of support at the level of institutions and social protection systems demotivates them and prevents them in their professional development.

 

References

Ajduković, M. Urbanc, K. (2010). Кvalitativna analiza iskustva stručnih djelatnika kao doprinos evaluaciji procesa uvođenja novog modela rada u centru za socijalnu skrb, Ljetopis socijalnog rada 17 (3) str. 319–352.

Androff, D. K. (2010). Truth and reconciliation commissions (TRCs): An international human rights intervention and its connection to social work. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1960–1977.

Atkinson, D. (1999). Advocacy, A Review, Brighton: Pavilion.

Barnett, J.E. Johnson, W.B. (2008), Etics desk reference for psychologists. Washington DC: American Psychological Associaction.

Basu, S. Stuckler, D. (2013). The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills, Published by Basic Books, URL: https://www.amazon.com/Body-Economic-Why-Austerity-Kills/dp/0465063985 Posjećeno 20.4.2019.

Brkić, М. (2010). Zastupanje u socijalnom radu, Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka.

Council on Social Work Education. (2014). Draft 2 of the Education Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/EPASRevision/72120.aspx. Accessed: 20.4.2019.

Ćuk, M. Gavrilović, A. Lepir, LJ. Gajić. D. (2017). Cjeloživotno učenje u kontekstu razvoja profesije socijalnog rada, Društvene i humanističke studije (DHS), Vol 2, No. 3, str. 361–378.

Fajgelj, S. (2004). Metode istraživanja ponašanja, Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.

Zakon o socijalnoj zaštiti (2012), Službeni glasnik RS broj 96/12, 90/16.

Žorga, S. Puhalić, A. (2019). Supervizija kao metoda razvoja profesionalne kompetencije, u knjizi Profesionalna supervizija Teorija i praksa, ur. Puhalić, A. Banja Luka: Fakultet političkih nauka Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci, str. 159–176.

IFSW (2014). Globalna definicija socijalnog rada, URL: https://www.ifsw.org/sr/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/ Posjećeno 12.05.2019.

IFSW Europe (2011). The social consequences of financial crisis. URL: http://ifsweurope-ifsweurope.blogspot.com/2011/04/social-consequencesof-financial-crisis.html, Posjećeno 13. 3. 2012.

Ilijaš, A. (2018). Nestabilnost zakona o socijalnoj skrbi – kako utječe na rad socijalnih radnika u centrima za socijalnu skrb?, Ljetopis socijalnog rada 25 (3), str. 407–450.

Knežević, М. (2013). Socijalni rad – profesija krize: Јe li vrijeme i za krizu profesije, Ljetopis socijalnog rada 20 (1), str. 31–50.

Komora socijalne zaštite Srbije (2019). Obuka pravnika u centru za socijalni rad, URL: https://www.komorasz.rs/, Posjećeno 15.05.2019.

McPherson, Ј. (2015). Human Rights Practice in Social Work: A Rights-Based Framework and Two New Measures, Florida State University Digital Library.

Milosavljević, М. (1998). Socijalni rad na međi vekova, Beograd: Draganić.

Miljenović, A. (2013). Ekonomska kriza – pokretač transformacije profesije socijalnog rada, Ljetopis socijalnog rada 20 (1), str. 51–70.

Ministarstvo zdravlja i socijalne zaštite (2018). Bilten socijalne zaštite 2017. URL: http://www.vladars.net/sr-SP-Cyrl/Vlada/Ministarstva/MZSZ/Publikacije/Documents/FINALNI%20Bilten%202017%201105.pdf, Posjećeno 20.02.2019.

Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman, A. & Burgess. R. G. (eds.), Analysing qualitative data. London: Rutledge, 173–194.

Solomon, B.B. (1985). Community social work in Oppresed Minoruty Communites“ In Taylor S.H.Robertz R. Theory and Practice of Commutity Social Work, Now York: Columbia Uneversity Press.

Vijeće Evrope (2001). Preporuke Vijeća Evrope o socijalnim radnicima, Revija za socijalnu politiku 8, (1), str. 61–64.

Published
2020/01/05
Section
Original Scientific Paper