PREĆUTNI PRISTANAK U DOKTRINAMA DŽONA LOKA I DŽONA ROLSA

  • Dragana Obačkić Fakultet političkih nauka Banja Luka, master student
Ključne reči: Legitimna vlast, država, prećutni pristanak, Džon Lok, Džon Rols

Sažetak


U političkoj teoriji često se postavlja pitanje kako da se uspostavi vlast koja je legitimna, a pritom se pod legitimnom vlašću podrazumijeva ona vlast koja ne ugrožava autonomiju volje pojedinca, koja je, prema savremenoj političkoj teoriji, uslov da bismo mogli da govorimo o vlasti nad građanima, u suprotnom možemo da govorimo o podanicima, što nije predmet ove tematike. Da bi se očuvala autonomija volje pojedinca, potrebno je da trpioci odluka vlasti dobrovoljno daju pristanak na tu vlast. U političkoj teoriji i praksi postoje različite vrste pristanka, pored ostalih postoji i izričit i prećutni pristanak. Ovaj rad baviće se fenomenom prećutnog  pristanka, preciznije analizom koncepta prećutnog pristanka u doktrinama Džona Loka i Džona Rolsa.

Reference

Beran, H. (1987). The Consent Theory of Political Obligation, London: Croom Helm.

Buchanan, J. (1975). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan,Chicago: Unevrsity of Chicago.

Darwal, S. (2003). Contractarianism/contractualism, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

FEE (1995) Tacit Consent: A Quiet Tyranny. Foundation for Economic Education, URL: https://fee.org/articles/tacit-consent-a-quiet-tyranny/. Pristupljeno 02. 01. 2020.

Green, A. S. (2012). Against Obligation-the Multiple Source of Authority in a Liberal Democracy, Harvard University Press.

Hobbes, T. ([1651] 1991). Leviathan, R. Tuck, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hume, D. ([1748] 1985). Of the Original Contract. In Essays: Moral, Political and Literary, E. Miller, ed., revised edition, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Hampton, J. (2007). The intrinsic Worth of Persons-Contractarianism in Moral and Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Farnham Daniel (ed); Cambridge University Press.

Klosko, G. (2011). Political Obligation.” In Klosko,G. ed. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kant, I. ([1793] 1970) On the Current Saying : This May Be True in Theory, but it does not Apply in Practice. In Kant’s Political Writings, H. Reiss, ed. H. Nisbet, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

King, L. A. (2013). Consent. URL: . 12. 2019.

Lok, Dž. (2002). Dvije rasprave o vladi. Beograd: Utopija.

Locke, J. ([1690] 1988). Second Treatise on Civil Government. In Two Treatises of Government. P. Laslett, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Raz, J. (1995). Ethics in the Public Domain-Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Teory of Justice. URL: http://www.consiglio.regione.campania.it/cms/CM_PORTALE_CRC/servlet/Docs?dir=docs_biblio&file=BiblioContenuto_3641.pdf. Pristupljeno 25. 12. 2019.

Singer, P. (1975). Democracy and Disobedience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Simmons, A. J. (1993). On the Ege of Anarchy: Locke, Consent, and the Limits of Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Simmons, A. J. (1979). Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Simmons, A. J. (1976). Tacit Consent and Political Obligation. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2264884?seq=1. Pristupljeno 2. 8. 2020.

Savanović, A. (2019). Teorija republike. Banja Luka: Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci, Fakultet političkih nauka.

Waldron, J. (1987). Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Objavljeno
2020/10/02
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Prethodno saopštenje