SECURITY COOPERATION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE REPUBLIC OF TURKIYE

  • Boris Tučić Fakultet bezbjednosnih nauka, Univerzitet u Banjoj Luci
  • Radmila Dragišić Faculty of Law, University of Banja Luka
Keywords: Turkiye, European Union, CFSP, CSDP, Ukranian conflict, war in Gaza strip

Abstract


By utilising the theoretical framework of the science of international relations and by relying on selected scientific methods, such as the content analysis, comparative and inductive method, the paper analyses the security cooperation between Turkiye and the European Union.. The analysis comprises two levels: at the first one, the focus is on the position and status of the Republic of Turkiye within relevant EU Common and Security Policy structures, such as PESCO projects, European Defense Agency Programmes, and military missions and operations led by the EU or within the EU – NATO partnership or the EU security and defense industry programmes; at the second one, the subject of the analysis are the positions of Turkiye and the EU regarding the most important issues of contemporary international relations and security, such as the Ukrainian war, the conflict in Gaza and general relations in the Middle East, the  relationship with the Russian Federation, as well as the most important factors determining the positions of the two sides in this context. One of the conclusions of the analysis implies that the great potential for the EU – Turkiye security cooperation has not been efficiently fulfilled because of numerous reasons, such as historically accumulated disagreements between Turkiye, on the one side, and some EU member states, on the other, differences between the two sides in the field of their identities and basic social, cultural and political values, as well as a continuously false EU strategic approach towards Turkiye and its status regarding the EU structures and policies. The EU must recognise Turkiye in its full capacity as a regional power and treat it as an equal, constructive partner. If not, especially taking into account monumental global geopolitical changes, the relations between the two sides might become even more deteriorated, with further negative impacts on their security cooperation.

References

Akgul – Acikmese, S., Koppa M. (2023). Turkey – EU relations: the security perspective and the CSDP. Kadir Has: Center for International and European Studies.

Al Jazeera. (28.10.2023). Erdogan pred million i po Turaka: zapad najdogovorniji za masakr u Gazi. Посећено: 15. 2. 2024. URL: https://balkans.aljazeera.net/news/world/2023/10/28/erdogan-pred-milion-i-po-turaka-zapad-najodgovorniji-za-masakr-u-gazi.

Anadolu Agency (23.11.2023). Turkyie – Russia trade volume to exceed 65 billion in 2023. Посећено: 14. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/economy/turkiye-russia-trade-volume-to-exceed-65b-in-2023/3062739.

Bassets, L. (1993). WEU, Europe`s Sleeping Beauty. Посећено: 11. 2. 2024. URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/weu_europe_s_sleeping_beauty_from_el_pais_25_january_1993-en-6e607cc6-3f25-4df3-b1a4-25300300f0df.htm.

Bloomberg. (29.7.2022). Russia is wiring dollars to Turkey for $20 billion nuclear plant. Посећено: 14. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-29/russia-is-wiring-dollars-to-turkey-for-20-billion-nuclear-plant.

Buzan, B., Weaver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: the Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ceylan, F., Nasi, S. (2023). EU – Turkey – UK Triangulation. 23/18. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali.

Dalay, G. (2021). Turkey, Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean: Charting a way out of the current deadlock. Brookings. Посећено: 16. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/turkey-europe-and-the-eastern-mediterranean-charting-a-way-out-of-the-current-deadlock/.

Davutoglu, A. (2009). Strategic Depth. Ankara: Kure Yayinlari.

Defense Industry Europe. (2023). Poland takes delivery of third batch of Bayraktar TB2 drones. Посећено: 15. 2. 2024. URL: https://defence-industry.eu/poland-takes-delivery-of-third-batch-of-bayraktar-tb2-drones/.

Ејдус, Ф. (2006). Тројански коњ на прагу Европе? Турско чланство у ЕУ и европска безбедност. Београдски центар за безбедносну политику. Посећено: 17. 2. 2024. URL: https://bezbednost.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ejdus_2006_trojanski_konj_na_pragu_evrope.pdf.

Euractiv. (22. 11. 2023). EU Faces Growing Muslim Animosity Over Gaza War Stance. Посећено: 12.2.2024. URL: https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/borrell-eu-faces-growing-muslim-animosity-over-gaza-war-stance/.

European Commission. (2023). Joint Communication to the European Council: State of Play of EU – Turkiye political, economic and trade relations. Посећено: 11. 2.2024. URL: https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-11/Joint%20Communication%20to%20the%20European%20Council%20-%20State%20of%20play%20of%20EU-Turkiye%20political%2C%20economic%20and%20trade%20relations.pdf.

European Council. (2016). EU – Turkey Statement and Action Plan of 18 March 2016. Посећено: 15. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/03/18/eu-turkey-statement/.

European Council (2000). Santa Maria da Feira Presidency Conclusions. 19 and 20 June 2000. Посећено: 13. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/fei1_en.htm.

European Council. Nice Presidency Conclusions. 7 – 10 December 2000. Посјећено: 13. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/nice1_en.htm.

European Council. Conclusions of 16 December 2021, EUCO 22/21. 16 December 2021.

EU Council. Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1639 of 5 November 2020 establishing the general conditions under which third states could exceptionally be invited to participate in individual PESCO projects. OJ L 371. 6 November 2020.

European Parliament. (2019). Parliament Wants to Suspend Accession Negotiations with Turkey. Посећено: 14. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20190307IPR30746/parliament-wants-to-suspend-eu-accession-negotiations-with-turkey#:~:text=Taking%20into%20account%20the%20human%20rights%20situation%20and,EU%20accession%20negotiations%20with%20Turkey%20be%20formally%20suspended.

European Parliament. (2019). Turkey`s Military Operation in Syria and its impact on relations with the EU. Посећено: 19. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS-Briefing-642284-Turkeys-military-operation-Syria-FINAL.pdf.

European Parliament. (2022). Annual Report on the Common Security and Defence Policy. Посећено: 13. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2023/739288/EPRS_ATA(2023)739288_EN.pdf.

Eurosam – Innovative Air Defense. (2017). Turkey, France and Italy sign an agreement on air defense. Посећено: 14. 2. 2024. URL: https://eurosam.com/turkey-france-and-italy-sign-an-agreement-on-air-defense/.

Ford, R. S. (2019). The Syrian Civil War: a new stage but is it the final one? Washington: Middle East Institute.

Jørgensen, K. E. (2018). The WEU: The Sleeping Beauty is Awake! In Flockhart, T. (ed.). From Vision to Reality: Implementing Europe`s New Security Order. (pp. 79–93). Oxford: Routledge.

Kibaroglu, M. (2019). On Turkey`s Missile Defense Strategy: The Four Faces of the S-400 Deal Between Turkey and Russia. Ankara: Center for Strategic Research, Paper 16/19.

Meyer, O.C. et. al. (2024). From EU Battlegroups to Rapid Deployment Capacity: learning the right lessons? International Affairs, 100(1): 181–201.

Nabiev, R., Nafikov, I. (2021). The Astana Process as an International Platform for Middle Eastern Regional Security: the Russian Mission. In Topsakal, I., Askerov, A. (eds.). Contemporary Russian – Turkish Relations from Past to Future. Istanbul: Istanbul University Press.

NATO. (2003). The NATO – EU Strategic Partnership. Посећено: 15. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.nato.int/docu/comm/2004/06-istanbul/press-kit/006.pdf.

NPR. (4.9.2023). Turkey has failed to persuade Russia to rejoin Ukraine grain deal. Посећено: 15. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.npr.org/2023/09/04/1197544117/russia-ukraine-grain-deal-turkey.

NovaNews. (7. 12. 2023). Grčka i Turska potpisale su 15 sporazuma tokom Saveta za saradnju na visokom nivou. Посећено: 11. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.agenzianova.com/sr/news/%D0%93%D1%80%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%B8-%D0%A2%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B5-%D1%81%D1%83-15-%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B0-%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC-%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D1%81%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%9A%D1%83-%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC-%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%83/.

Official Journal of the European Communities. Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey. L 361/29, 12 September 1963.

Official Journal of the European Communities. Treaty of Amsterdam Amending the Treaty of European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts, OJ C 340, 11 November 1997.

Skidelsky, R. (14. 2. 2024). Why Peace Negotations Between Russia and Ukraine Failed. Wire. Посећено: 18. 2. 2024. URL: https://thewire.in/world/why-peace-negotiations-between-russia-and-ukraine-failed.

Tučić, B. (2023). Strateški kompas za bezbednost i odbranu Evropske unije: platforma za globalno delovanje u okviru Zajedničke bezbednosne i odbrambene politike? Žurnal za bezbjednost i kriminalistiku. 5/2: 21–32.

UN Comtrade. (2024). Trade Data. Посећено: 17. 2. 2024. URL: https://comtradeplus.un.org/TradeFlow?Frequency=A&Flows=X&CommodityCodes=TOTAL&Partners=792&Reporters=all&period=2023&AggregateBy=none&BreakdownMode=plus.

WEU Council of Ministers. (1992). Petersberg Declaration. Посећено: 10. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1999/1/1/16938094-bb79-41ff-951c-f6c7aae8a97a/publishable_en.pdf.

World Bank. (2024). World Bank in Turkey – Overview. Посећено: 17. 2. 2024. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/turkey/overview.

Published
2024/09/26
Section
Review Paper