Evaluation of the usability of Web-based applications
Abstract
The paper emphasizes the importance of the usability of Web-based applications as an essential condition for attracting and retaining customers. At the beginning of the paper, a general classification of methods for usability evaluation is given in order to show different views of researchers on usability. In order to ensure a Web application lifetime, it is necessary to measure and evaluate many features that affect software usability. The paper gives a brief overview of the most commonly used methods for evaluating the usability of Web-based applications published in the last decade, chosen by the author. Since decision making is not an easy process, the conclusion gives recommendations to be specially considered when selecting a method.
References
Abdinnour-Helm, S.F., Chaparro, B.S., & Farmer, S.M., 2005. Using the End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) Instrument to Measure Satisfaction with a Web Site. Decision Sciences, 36(2), pp.341-364. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2005.00076.x.
Becker, P., & Olsina, L., 2010. Towards Support Processes for Web Projects. Argentina: La Pampa, GIDIS_Web, Engineering School, UNLPam.
Bublione, L., Gasparro, F., Giacobbe, E., & Grande, C., 2002. A Quality Model for Web-based Enviroments: GUFPI-ISMA Viewpoint. Rome: GUFPIISMA.
Ðorđević, N., 2017. Usability: key characteristic of software quality. Vojnotehnički glasnik / Military Technical Courier, 65(2), pp.513-529. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg65-11028.
- ISO, 1996. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs): Part 10: Dialogue principles. 9241-10.
- ISO, 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs): Part 11: Guidance on usability.Geneva, Switzerland. 9241-11.
Lew, P., & Olsina, L., 2011. Instantiating Web Quality Models in a Purposeful Way. In: 1st Int’l Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE), Paphos, Cyprus, pp.214-229
Loiacono, E., Watson, R., & Goodhue, D., 2002. WebQual™: A Measure of Web Site Quality. Worcester, Massachusetts: Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia.
Murgesan, S., 2008. Web Application Development: Challenges and The Role of Web Engineering. In G. Rossi& et al Ed., Web Engineering: Modelling and Implementing Web Applications.Springer, pp.7-32, ch. 2.
Muylle, S., Moenaert, R., & Despontin, M., 2004. The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Information & Management, 41(5), pp.543-560. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00089-2.
Nielsen, J. 1994., Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R.L. Mack Ed., Usability Inspection Methods. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Olsina, L., & Molina, H., 2008. How To Measure And Evaluate Web Applications In A Consistent Way. In G. Rossi& et al Ed., Web Engineering: Modelling and Implementing Web Applications. London: Springer, pp.385-420, ch. 8.
Olsina, L., & Rossi, G., 2002. Measuring Web Application Quality with WebQEM. IEEE MultiМedia, 9(4), pp.20-29. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2002.1041945.
Oztekin, A., Nikov, A., & Zaim, S., 2009. UWIS: An assessment methodology for usability of web-based information systems. The Journal of Systems and Software, 82(12), pp.2038-2050.
Zhou, Z., 2009. Evaluating Websites Using a Practical Quality Model. De Montfort University, Software Technology Research Laboratory.
Proposed Creative Commons Copyright Notices
Proposed Policy for Military Technical Courier (Journals That Offer Open Access)
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).