Aerodynamic airfoil at critical angles of attack

  • Čedomir Lj. Kostić Serbian Armed Forces General Staff, Air Force and Air Defence, 204th Air Force Brigade
  • Boško P. Rašuo Univerzitet u Beogradu, Mašinski fakultet, Katedra za vazduhoplovstvo
Keywords: aerodynamic, performance of airfoils, fluid dynamics, airfoil shape, critical angles of attack,

Abstract


Aircraft construction experts must not neglect the behavior of aircraft in extreme or closely extreme flight conditions, such as flights at critical angles of attack, where a normal flight can be easily converted into a stall.

This paper highlights the essential factors that influence the behavior of aircraft in flight at critical angles of attack. Based on the available experimental results and estimations, the performances of airfoils were analysed depending on air flow conditions (categorized according to Mach and Reynolds numbers), airfoil shapes, dynamics of the transition of  angles of attack, description of the flow around airfoils with increasing the angle of attack upon reaching a critical value, and the effect of roughness of airfoil surfaces at critical angles of attack.

The paper gives a physical interpretation of a lift decrease and a stall. It minutely describes the origin of flow separation and categorizes airfoil sections by type of separation and their behavior during the flow at the critical angle of attack.

Based on modern aerodynamics, this paper aims to show and explain the issues and the most important characteristics of the flow past the body at  critical angles of attack and give practical recommendations for airfoil design. As such, it may be of interest to pilots and engineers as well as to educational and research institutions.

 

Author Biographies

Čedomir Lj. Kostić, Serbian Armed Forces General Staff, Air Force and Air Defence, 204th Air Force Brigade
MS in mechanical engineering
Boško P. Rašuo, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Mašinski fakultet, Katedra za vazduhoplovstvo

redovni profesor

doktor

dipl.inž. mašinstva

References

Cone, D.D. 1985.Maximum Lift.NASA TN D-657.

Critzos, A. 1985.Maximum Lift NACA 0012, 0015, α=0o-180o,.NACA TN 3361.

Doenhoff, A.E. Foil sections tested in two dimensions by NACA, Low-Turbulence Pressure Tunnel, T Rpt 1283. Retrieved from www.ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19930090976.pdf

Gretchikhin, L.I. 2014. Force of the air pressure on a moving plate. Vojnotehnički glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 62(4), pp. 38-50.doi:10.5937/vojtehg62-5369

Hoerner, S.F., & Borst, H.V. 1985. Fluid-dynamic lift: Practical information on aerodynamic and hydrodynamic lift.Vancouver: Brick Town : Hoerner.

Kostić, Č. 2010.Ispitivanje karakteristika kovita aviona u letu.Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Mašinski fakultet.

McCullough,G.B.1955. Investigation of boundary layer and stalling.NACA TN 1683.

Pinkerton, I. 1996. Maximum lift 4412 Distribution. NACA T Rpt613.

von Karman,T. 2001. Lifting-line theory for a wing in non-uniform flow.Analysis of Maximum Lift,Robert A. Millikan Library, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.

Published
2016/06/07
Section
Review Papers