PENAL POPULISM - ORIGIN, DEVELOPMENT AND FUTURE
Abstract
During the last few decades, penal populism has been one of the continuously present criminal political trends globally. Propositions of penal populism could be briefly reduced to stricter punishment for offenders, allegedly in accordance with the attitudes and wishes of the wider public. The problems of penal populism concern its scientific and empirical lack of foundation, i.e. the lack of concrete argumentation when devising inventive solutions, as well as the lack of consultation with the professional public. Therefore, the authors tried to point out the basic assumptions and practical implications of penal populism through the analysis of the literature, with the aim of introducing the concept to the wider public and opening space for debate. By summarizing the experiences of comparative law, with a special focus on Serbia, the authors point out that despite the significant socio-economic differences, the positions of penal populism largely coincide in different parts of the world. Scientific methods of content analysis, normative-logical and comparative legal methods were applied. The authors conclude that penal populism will not just disappear, and that it should therefore be recognized and studied in order to develop future criminal policies in accordance with the dynamics and structure of criminality, but also with adequate consideration of public attitudes and opinions.
References
Andrews, D. A. & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1): 39.
Batrićević, A. (2016). Krivičnopravna reakcija na femicid, Temida, 19(3‒4): 431–451.
Bell, E. (2022). Seizing the Populist Moment: Towards a New Penal Politics?. The British Journal of Criminology, 62(5): 1077‒1092.
Boda, Z. et al. (2022). Two decades of penal populism–the case of Hungary. Review of Central and East European Law, 47(1): 115‒138.
Bottoms, A. E. (1995), The Philosophy and Politics of Punishment and Sentencing, In C. Clarkson and R. Morgan (eds), The Politics of Sentencing Reform (pp. 17‒49). Oxford: Clarendon Press
Cheliotis, L. (2006). Penal managerialism from within: Implications for theory and research, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29(5): 397‒404.
Ćopić, S. (2023). Snižavanje starosne granice krivične odgovornosti: Večita dilema?, Crimen, 14(3): 235‒247.
Getoš Kalac, A. M. & Feuerbach, L. (2023). On (Measuring) Recidivism, Penal Populism and the Future of Recidivism Research: Neuropenology, Godišnjak Akademije pravnih znanosti Hrvatske, 14(1): 1‒28.
Grzyb, M. (2021). Penal populism: Negotiating the feminist agenda. Evidence from Spain and Poland, European Journal of Criminology, 18(6): 836‒854.
Hamilton, C. (2023). Radical right populism and the sociology of punishment: Towards a research agenda, Punishment & Society, 25(4): 888‒908.
Hogg, R. (2022). Rethinking populism and its threats and possibilities, Archiwum Kryminologii, 1(XLIV): 15‒38.
Ilijić, Lj. (2015). Zatvorska kazna i resocijalizacija – faktori ne/uspješnosti. U M. Hugson i Z. Stevanović (ur.), Kriminal i društvo Srbije – izazovi društvene dezintegracije, društvene regulacije i očuvanja društvene sredine (str. 303–316). Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.
Jennings, W. et al. (2017). Penal populism and the public thermostat: Crime, public punitiveness, and public policy, Governance, 30(3): 463‒481.
Karapetrović, M. (2019). Ontologija i politika ‒ od nesaglasnosti do odsutnosti ‒ politička filozofija Žaka Ransijera i Slavoja Žižeka, Politeia, 9(18): 51‒65.
Krajewski, K. (2023). Penal exceptionalism in countries of Central Europe: Why is the region different?, Archivum Krimilogii, 45(2): 171‒211.
Lauri, M, Carbin, M. & Linander, I. (2023). The rise of carceral feminism in Sweden: Analysing political debate and policy on men's violence against women. In Women's Studies International Forum. Posjećeno 14. 08. 2024. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539523001073?via%3Dihub
Lazarević, Lj. (1994). Odnos između kriminalne politike i krivičnog prava ‒Prilog shvatanjima profesora Milutinovića, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 1‒2: 119‒133.
Lukić, R., Košutić, B. i Mitrović, D. (1999). Uvod u pravo. Beograd: Službeni list SRJ.
Matić Bošković, M. i Kostić, J. (2024) Penal Populism and (Ab)use of Criminal Law. In Revisiting the Limits of Freedom While Living Under Threat: 9‒10 November 2023, Riga: Collection of research papers in conjunction with the 9th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. University of Latvia Press: 79‒88.
Matus, J. P. (2023). Penal populism In K. Ambos & J. Martinez (eds.), Gottingen Handbook on Latin American Public Law and Criminal Justice (pp. 649‒658). Nomos.
Mills, A. (2018). Penal populism, crime and criminal justice in New Zealand. Nordiska Samarbetsrådet för Kriminologi: 15‒21.
NEOSTART (2021). Risk Bulletin produced by the Civil Society Observatory to Counter Organized Crime in South Eastern Europe, Posjećeno 14. 08. 2024. URL: https://riskbulletins.globalinitiative.net/download/see-obs-004-screen-pdf.pdf
Pratt, J. (2007). Penal populism, Routledge: New York.
Pratt, J. & Miao, M. (2017). Penal Populism: The End of Reason. Posjećeno: 12. 08. 2024. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312594772_Penal_Populism_The_End_of_Reason
Pratt, J., & Miao, M. (2019). The end of penal populism: The rise of populist politics. Archiwum Kryminologii, (XLI/2): 15‒40.
Quimet, M. (2002). Explaining the American and Canadian crime drop in the 1990s. New French Journal of Criminology, 1: 33‒50.
Republički zavod za statistiku Srbije (RZS) (2021). Punoletni učinioci krivičnih dela u Republici Srbiji, 2020 ‒ Saopštenje br. 195 od 14. jula 2024. godine, Beograd.
Republički zavod za statistiku Srbije (RZS) (2024). Punoletni učinioci krivičnih dela, 2023 ‒ Saopštenje br. 186 od 12. jula 2024. godine, Beograd.
Stevanović, I. i Vujačić, N. (2017). Uslovni otpust: norma, praksa i mere unapređenja. In Reformski procesi i Poglavlje 23 (godinu dana posle) ‒ krivičnopravni aspekti. LVII Savetovanje Srpskog udruženja za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu (str. 114‒128). Beograd: Srpsko udruženje za krivičnopravnu teoriju i praksu.
Stojanović, Z. (2011). Preventivna funkcija krivičnog prava, Crimen, 2(1), 3‒25.
Šprem, P. i Getoš Kalac, A. (2024). Obiteljsko nasilje u svjetlu penalnog populizma. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 74 (1): 35‒70.
Todd-Kvam, J. (2019). Bordered penal populism: When populism and Scandinavian exceptionalism meet, Punishment & Society, 21(3): 295‒314.
Woźniakowska-Fajst, D. & Witkowska-Rozpara, K. (2022). How neoclassical criminology, penal populism and COVID-19 helped to escalate the repressiveness of criminal law–the case of Poland, Archives of Criminology, (XLIV/1): 77‒106.
- Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dijele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.
- Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
- Autorima je dozvoljeno i podstiču se da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) prije ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmjeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka (Vidi Efekti otvorenog pristupa).